As a follow-up on the mocking issue

Over there on, David Hayden has posted something about Model-View-Presenter that is a typical example of the confusion I was talking about in my post on why mock frameworks suck.

The interface wasn't mocked, what David did was to create a test double (a fake or a stub depending on how you look at it, but not a mock!) using a mock framework. Again, I don't object on the use of the mock framework (see my previous entry as to where my objection is), but I think we're muddying the water for everybody if we don't get the semantics correct.

Or am I really the only one thinking you should use the right tool for the right job?